1-How many number of column in that table? 2-How many number of records to recover? 3-How many records do you have in the log? Normally, it takes few seconds per record. on September 14, 2012 at 2:36 pm Muhammad Imran Hi Sandeep, How many records did u try to recover? Can you please post the test table and records as well
Facebook Microsoft OLE DB provider for SQL Server error 80004005 BY Mahesh Gupta on August 10, 2012 0 comments While browsing a ASP site, you end up getting SQL Server error 80004005. Thus by End of 1st year, our database size is expected to be 13 GB (1 Gb initial and 1 GB per month) After a year company is expected to come up with big launch and will advertise in market and expected 5 time growth in second year i.e
sql server - Is it possible to shrink an .MDF file on a drive with low free space? - Database Administrators Stack Exchange
I have only 12 GB free space and while running the shrink command on the .MDF file, logs are growing and consume the free space -- low disk spaces throws the shrinking into a no respond state. You could "archive" old data to free space in the current .mdf, or you could leave the current data file as-is and it would become an archive, of sorts
With the upcoming SQL Server 2005 extended support deadline fast approaching, they want to understand how to help you migrate to a modern, supported version of SQL Server, and how to provide support and upgrades in future. There are a number of reasons for poor storage performance, but measuring it and understanding what needs to be measured and monitored is always a useful exercise
When we need to move the tables or indexes to other filegroup? We should move those table need to move which are having more rows or heavily in size, Also need to move if those tables data are frequently updated
ActionsLogin or register to post comments VJware Symantec Employee Accredited BE Exec 2014SP1 : Database maintenance failure after moving DB to another server - Comment:13 Nov 2014 : Link Using BEUtility, this is expected as mentioned in the KB posted earlier. Upcoming Events Transform Backup to Transform Your Business 23 Jul, 2015 - 10:00 PDT Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for UNIX: Administration - Authorized Training 10 Aug, 2015 - 11:00 EDT Links Technical Support Symantec Training Symantec.com Purchase Backup Exec for Small Business SORT The Latest Veritas Product Releases are Here! NetBackup 7.7, InfoScale, Veritas Resiliency Platform, Risk Advisor and Information Map Learn More Do You Use Docker Container? We want to talk to you
Is it useful to have the SQL Server instance root directory on a separate drive? - Database Administrators Stack Exchange
This means that on what would normally be a relatively clean drive with just folders and database files on it I now have a full installation of the SQL Server binaries as well. I'd put all SQL binaries for all instances on S in most situations, with the folders providing the separation) (ED- Another note - I often don't have an "S" drive available
SQL Server tempdb Data Files
In this last situation is preffered configure SAME options (size, filegrowth and max size) for mdf and ndf files? Reply Paul Randal says: June 9, 2013 at 2:39 am Yes, same settings for all data files. If every CPU is running a task and each of those tasks is using tempdb, the number of threads hitting tempdb will be the same as the number of logical CPUs
Back up the TRANSACTION LOG FOR the DATABASE TO free up SOME LOG SPACE Make sure that TempDB is set to autogrow and do not set a maximum size for TempDB. There is no open transactions running under tempdb or any sessions connected to it, but still the tempdb is growing i have enough space for tempdb to grow, but want to know the reasons for it
The point to remember here is that it will create the database at the default location specified for SQL Server Instance (this default instance can be changed and we will see that in future blog posts). Do it if you are confident that they are not needed or due to any reason there is a connection to the database which you are not able to kill manually after review
No comments:
Post a Comment