Canon EOS 6D vs 5D Mark III, Canon EOS 6D vs Nikon D600 - DxOMark
The Canon 100mm F2 EF rates above the Zeiss 100mm F2 ZE by one point, but a closer look at the scores for individual areas shows the Zeiss to equal (transmission, vignetting) or better (sharpness, chromatic aberration, distortion) the Canon in all areas
Canon 5D Mark III Review
Unlike Nikon's, which recognizes faces and does an amazing job of nailing focus on the closest eye, the Canon 5D Mark III just looks for the closest distraction, and focuses on that instead of the subject most of the time. Much less is held hostage from us before we stop and press the PLAY button, the LCD's automatic brightness control is worlds better, and as I've been asking for years from Canon, for the first time, when you zoom, the entire LCD fills with image
Cheers, Sven Dimitris says: March 23, 2012 at 6:43 pm Dxomark labs rates Nikon d800 in the top of there list with score 95!!!!! It must be a hell of a camera Celi says: March 25, 2012 at 5:58 pm a friend recommended this website to me, he said that your posts are the best so i came to read your post and realized he was right. I contest these are not real world comparisons! I will take my 5Dmk3 up against any D800 any time!! 35mm f1.4L, 100mm f2.8L IS, 24-105 f4L and 70-200 f2.8L IS ii
Unscientific Final Thoughts: As frustrated as I was with the Canon focus system at first, I found myself continually reaching for my Mark III over my D700 over the course of the past few months. Canon has made me work to achieve a level of comfort with their equipment, but ultimately, I prefer the end results and the extra work and learning curve is worth it to me
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Vs. Nikon D800: Which Is Better for Filming Strippers?
The folks at Crisis Lab outfitted both cameras with identical prime lenses, and tested performance in some key areas like image resolution, rolling shutter, video resolution, and low-light video quality. (Rolling shutter is the weird, wobbly distortion that occurs when objects are moving quickly through as DSLR's frame while shooting video.) But put both cameras in a dark room with strippers to test how they hold up with ISO sensitivity is jacked up while shooting video, and you'll see the 5D Mark III demolish the D800
Nikon D810 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
That being said, photographers looking for the ultimate resolution and sharpness in a DSLR camera will find no better than the Nikon D810, if used with sharp prime lenses. Download the RAW files for the Exposure Recovery comparison Nikon D810 with 105mm f2.8 VR Macro vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III with 100mm f2.8L IS The following test was done outside, in open shade, without the use of a tripod or live view
The Nikon cameras (also the entry level ones) are much much better than Canon at capturing details from the shadows and from light sources, with in one shot. Well done and I enjoyed your photos! Reply Jacob Surland says: September 5, 2013 at 9:08 pm Hi Steve, Thank you very much for both compliments! Have a nice day
Ron Martinsen's Photography Blog: FAIL: Nikon D800 Live View vs Canon 5D Mark III
I have not been happy with my Nikon D7000, 2 years old and I had to replace the auto-focus switch and still have issues with it not auto- focusing, I was ready to bite the bullet and go to the D800, the 4 FPS, kind of disappointed me. I like Canon and Fujifilm too! I wrote this article to raise awareness of what I believe to be a bug that limits the usability of the D800, not to bash it
Ron Martinsen's Photography Blog: COMPARISON: Nikon D800 vs Canon 5D Mark III
Click here to order yours now if you are like the last two or three people on Earth who has just come out of a cave to learn that the perfect camera has finally arrived! Conclusion for those who think DxOMark Sensor Ratings are the word of God Please refer to the conclusion above for D800 Owners and Nikon Enthusiasts. The rest of the camera settings are the same as the Nikon and I was able to focus a little better thanks to Live View performance of the 5D Mark III (more on that later)
Even so, it has 4.2MP more than the 18.1MP Canon EOS-1DX, which sits at the top of Canon's DSLR lineup.Thanks to its eight-channel readout and DIGIC 5 processing engine, the Canon EOS 5D Mark III can shoot continuously at a maximum rate of up to 6fps, while the Nikon D800's Expeed 3 engine enables it to shoot full-resolution images at up to four frames per second (fps).Buying GuideBest Nikon cameras 2012Given its higher pixel count, it's not surprising that the Nikon D800's native sensitivity range (ISO 100-6400) is more restricted than the Canon 5D Mark III's, which runs from ISO 100-25600. However, the introduction of features such as Live View and video recording mean that the way we use a DSLR is changing, and consequently manufacturers need to adapt their camera control layout
Canon 5D Mark III vs Nikon D800 - Our Analysis
i dont know where you did pull all that information from, but right now you sound like a silly fanboy.prove your photography instead of crying your gear is better, if your gear is better and you still preform worse than the nikon guy, does that make you a shitty photographer or was your gear just too bad? Snix (11:52 AM, August 05, 2014) shutter speed of d800 is a bit slow? what?.... Satyam Joshi (10:47 AM, August 31, 2013) I'll go for the DSLR which has higher low light capability !..may be more than 2000 and still grain-noise doesn't appear ! The Miz (0:46 PM, August 21, 2013) This is a review site
Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs. Nikon D800: Competition is closer than expected! - DxOMark
Indeed, with the right glass, the sensor in the Canon EOS 5D Mark III is capable of closing the gap between them in resolution to negligible values, and that other reasons for choosing between them may be more relevant or important.Time will tell if the differences in price and features will weigh more heavily in favour of one over the other, but, some care must be taken when choosing lenses in order to maximise the potential image sharpness. While both share a similar HD video capability the 5D Mark III has a highly sensitive and accurate 61-point focusing system, durable pro-level build, excellent live view implementation, and can capture stills at up to 6fps (compared with 4.5 fps for the Nikon)
Now to be fair, Nikon has always been less noise-averse than Canon and in the past has been happy to let some fine textures appear in preference to smearing out fine detail - and the same approach is clearly being applied here. At 400 ISO though, those noise textures on the D800 have become a little more obvious, and while a minor patchiness is also now appearing on the Mark III, the Canon is definitely cleaner at this point
No comments:
Post a Comment